Found search results for ""

Read Time — 3 minutes

Supply Chains In 2026: The Shift Is Done. Now Comes The Hard Part.

A procurement manager and production planner review supplier data at a monitor and tablet in a factory office overlooking the shop floor.

For years, the dominant logic in manufacturing supply chains was efficiency above everything else. Lean inventory. Just-in-time delivery. Minimal buffer stock. Squeeze out cost at every point in the chain.

Then the disruptions came, and have seemingly continued to come.

Australian manufacturers have moved away from pure just-in-time models toward supplier diversification, buffer stocks, and China-plus-one sourcing strategies. Rather than resilience as a strategy slide, resilience now seems to lie in how procurement and operations teams work.

However, completing the shift and executing it well are two different things, and according to the data gathered the first half of the year, the gap between the two is where the real story lives.

About the 2026 Australian and New Zealand Manufacturing Mid-Year Report

This blog is part of a series exploring the key findings from ECI's 2026 Australian and New Zealand Manufacturing Mid-Year Report. This is a fact-checked review of the trends reshaping ANZ manufacturing at the halfway point of the year. Each piece pulls from the data we validated across 60-plus industry, government, and research sources, so you can go as deep as you need.

 

The numbers for this first half

What the data showsFigure
AU supply chain management market projected value by 2034~USD $2.28 billion
Manufacturing output growth, year to December 2025+1.2%
Businesses that initiated carbon reduction projects in 202564%
Federal Future Made in Australia investment commitmentAUD $22 billion-plus

Output is up, margins are not

This is the part that doesn't make the headline.

Manufacturing output returning to 1.2% growth in the year from what it was in December 2025 is a positive. In fact, it reversed the contractions of 2024, and it reflects true progress. But recovered output and recovered profitability are two different things, and as we looked through the first half of the year, it is worth noting that the two data points have not moved together.

Input cost inflation across energy, freight, and raw materials has been relentless. For discrete manufacturers, that means job costs are harder to predict. For those operating in food, beverage, chemicals, and other continuous or batch-driven environments, it means yield pressures and formulation costs are eating into margins that were already thin. Across the board, the money available for digital and sustainability projects is being squeezed by the same cost environment that's making those projects more necessary.

Sustainability has stopped being optional

According to MHD Supply Chain, 64% of Australian businesses initiated carbon reduction projects in 2025. 

Many of those projects haven't progressed because the physical infrastructure isn't there. Plants that can't support solar, battery, or grid upgrades without major capital works are stuck between the desire to get it done and asset reality.

More immediately: sustainability compliance is now a commercial gate. The federal Environmentally Sustainable Procurement Policy means that if you want government tender work like defence, healthcare, energy, infrastructure, then you need data to prove you meet the standard.

The sovereign opportunity has conditions

According to RSM Global, the AUD $22 billion-plus Future Made in Australia agenda has sharpened sovereign capability as a genuine commercial priority. Defence, healthcare, and energy buyers are actively favouring Australian-made supply, and for SMB manufacturers, that represents a meaningful growth lane in the second half of 2026 and beyond.

The condition is that you can prove it. Consistent delivery, cost traceability, and material variance control are exactly the kinds of capabilities buyers are now verifying before awarding contracts. Hidden freight costs, landed-cost surprises, and margin leakage that only surfaces at month-end are the things that disqualify otherwise competitive manufacturers from this opportunity. Today, visibility is a commercial requirement.

Practical questions into 2027

The supply chain shift is complete. The next question is whether your systems give you the visibility to operate resiliently at margin.

Knowing your landed costs in real time. Understanding the true cost of a job before it is invoiced. Tracking sustainability data in a way that survives a tender audit. These capabilities are now the baseline for competing in the market.

If you're not sure where your business sits, our Manufacturing Performance Assessment is a good place to start. This quick diagnostic shows you exactly where the gaps are.
 

FAQs

Why are Australian manufacturers moving away from just-in-time supply chains?

Manufacturers are shifting away from pure just-in-time models because continued disruptions have exposed the risk of relying on minimal inventory and limited supplier options. Many are now using supplier diversification, buffer stock, and China-plus-one sourcing to build more resilient operations.

What capabilities do manufacturers need to compete through 2027?

Manufacturers need timely visibility into landed costs, accurate job-cost information before invoicing, and sustainability data that can withstand tender audits. These capabilities support resilient supply-chain operations while helping businesses protect margins and compete for new work.

What is the Future Made in Australia opportunity for SMB manufacturers?

The Future Made in Australia agenda has increased the commercial importance of sovereign manufacturing capability. Australian-made supply is being favoured in areas such as defence, healthcare, and energy, creating potential growth opportunities for small-to-midsize manufacturers that can meet buyer requirements.

Why are manufacturing margins still under pressure despite output growth?

Input-cost inflation across energy, freight, and raw materials continues to pressure margins. These costs make job costs harder to predict, increase yield and formulation pressures in process manufacturing, and reduce the funds available for digital and sustainability initiatives.